Minister of War: Reports

[New Nation Info]

Reports for the Minister of War.

[New Nation Info]

17 February 2005
Report by the Ministry of War
Returned Troops from Carldenburg

Troops in Carldenburg
Ther are at present 90,000 troops in Carldenburg. Most of the Royal Air Force has returned to Britannica, the Royal Navy has retired to port.

Plans for return
Just before April the 2,500 Guards will return home for His Majesty's brithday parade on 29 April.
An extra 10,000 approx. will return in May.
Another 2
25,000 aprrox. will return in June/July.
40,000 approx. will return in August.
The 12,500 troops left will return by the end of the year.

[Slim]

the members of the liberal party would like to welcome home all of the warriors that fought in Carldenberg. they are the heroes who have fought to uphold our people's rights and i thank them for their efforts.
_________________
ta ta

[Slim]

i see no praises for our brave warriors from their supposed leader Edmund Carlosse
_________________
ta ta

[lslarry]

We (the prime minister, home office minister and the Minister of war) have already been to congradulate them personally in an extremely 'low-key' parade.
So try not to make too many assumptions
_________________
Good Day

[New Nation Info]

3 March 2005
Report by Ministry of War
Army Cuts

After the war with Carldenburg, we need to gently return the armed forces to normak size, but at the same getting thigs done.

Army at the moment
235,000 army personnel
1050 main battle tanks

Projected Peacetime army
Note: Thes enumbers are based on the on the ration of perosnnel/tanks to population as what is in the case in the UK. So we get a proper look at what are armed forces should be.

71,200 army personnel (-163,800 troops)
370 main battke tabks (-680 tanks)

[leslie]

Would the Minister like to say why there is no compensation for the laid of Troops?

Would the Minister like to explain why we are laying of Troops that were laying down their life for us not long ago?

Would the Minister like to explain why we must, take colonies to keep up with our neighbours but dont need a army to defend the homeland?

Would the Minister like to explain why Parika has been colonised to train troops despite the fact we are laying them all of?

[New Nation Info]

20 March 2005
Report by Ministry of War
Colonies of the World

Colonies of Britannica
OHIONA
Population: 94,000
MARIOKA
Population: 88,650
TIRANOV
Population: 89,350
RAGNALD HEAD
Population: 21,340

Total Colonial Population: 293,340

Colonies of Condors
PETITE COLONIE
Population: 7,690

Colonies of Gravenhauge
KONINKLIJKE
Population: 39,500

Colonies of Jylland
INHAM
Population: 16,250

Colonies of Namiens
GLOIRE COLONIE
Population: 82,390
COTE DE REPUBLIQUE
Population: 39,800
SEUL ROULER
Population: 54,370
CONQUETE INTERIEURE
Population: 9,200
AVANCE PIEUSE
Population: 79,330

Total Colonial Population: 265,090

Joint Colonies of Britannica and Namiens
PARIKA
Population: 15,490

[Slim]

im sorry leslie but our minister for war is unable to answer your questions for whatever reason he deems fitting. as a shadow minister for war i see it necessary that i should attempt to answer your questions with the limited information available to me.

it seems that there is no compensation for the redundant troops because it is not part of policy, this is probably not carlosses' fault but the fault of the conservative party policy in general.
the government are laying off troops that have fought and bled for the crown because there is no need for them in peacetime Britannica, it is good that there is no bloodloss in these times but there should be provisions of work and money for these heroes. it is the least we owe them for providing us with freedom.
the third question about no troops at home is due to a fault in the defence strategy. maybe the government think that the people will defend the streets against the invader though, due to the serious faults in social provision i doubt this very much. we need a liberal government to provide the people with a sense of national pride.
they are training troops in Parika whilst laying them off, i would imagine, to cut the expense of having to pay experienced veterans so they can pay raw recruits less though with the cost of lives. that seems an acceptable price to the conservative government.

i hope i have answered your questions well, i ask for all other shadow ministers of war to answer the questions from your viewpoint. the more opinions we have the more effective a defence policy we can have for Britannica.

thank you.
_________________
ta ta