View Full Version: Minister of War: Reports

britannica >>Ministry of War >>Minister of War: Reports


<< Prev | Next >>

New Nation Info- 02-17-2005
Minister of War: Reports
Reports for the Minister of War.

New Nation Info- 02-17-2005

17 February 2005 Report by the Ministry of War Returned Troops from Carldenburg Troops in Carldenburg Ther are at present 90,000 troops in Carldenburg. Most of teh Royal Air Force has returned to Britannica, the Royal Navy has retired to port. Plans for return Just before April the 2,500 Guards will return home for His Majesty's brithday parade on 29 April. An extra 10,000 approx. will return in May. Another 2 25,000 aprrox. will return in June/July. 40,000 approx. will return in August. The 12,500 troops left will return by the end of the year.

Slim- 02-20-2005
heroes return
the members of the liberal party would like to welcome home all of the warriors that fought in Carldenberg. they are the heroes who have fought to uphold our people's rights and i thank them for their efforts.

Slim- 02-25-2005

i see no praises for our brave warriors from their supposed leader Edmund Carlosse

lslarry- 02-25-2005

We (the prime minister, home office minister and the Minister of war) have already been to congradulate them personally in an extremely 'low-key' parade. So try not to make too many assumptions

New Nation Info- 03-03-2005

3 March 2005 Report by Ministry of War Army Cuts After the war with Carldenburg, we need to gently return teh armed forces to normak size, but at teh same getting thigs done. Army at teh moment 235,000 army personnel 1050 main battle tanks Projected Peacetime army Note: Thes enumbers are based on the on the ration of perosnnel/tanks to population as what is in the case in the UK. So we get a proper look at what are armed forces should be. 71,200 army personnel (-163,800 troops) 370 main battke tabks (-680 tanks)

leslie- 03-04-2005

Would the Minister like to say why there is no compensation for the laid of Troops? Would the Minister like to explain why we are laying of Troops that were laying down their life for us not long ago? Would the Minister like to explain why we must, take colonies to keep up with our neighbours but dont need a army to defend the homeland? Would the Minister like to explain why Parika has been colonised to train troops despite the fact we are laying them all of?

New Nation Info- 03-20-2005

20 March 2005 Report by Ministry of War Colonies of teh World Colonies of Britannica OHIONA Population: 94,000 MARIOKA Population: 88,650 TIRANOV Population: 89,350 RAGNALD HEAD Population: 21,340 Total Colonial Population: 293,340 Colonies of Condors PETITE COLONIE Population: 7,690 Colonies of Gravenhauge KONINKLIJKE Population: 39,500 Colonies of Jylland INHAM Population: 16,250 Colonies of Namiens GLOIRE COLONIE Population: 82,390 COTE DE REPUBLIQUE Population: 39,800 SEUL ROULER Population: 54,370 CONQUETE INTERIEURE Population: 9,200 AVANCE PIEUSE Population: 79,330 Total Colonial Population: 265,090 Joint Colonies of Britannica and Namiens PARIKA Population: 15,490

Slim- 03-24-2005
reply to leslie
im sorry leslie but our minister for war is unable to answer your questions for whatever reason he deems fitting. as a shadow minister for war i see it necessary that i should attempt to answer your questions with the limited information available to me. it seems that there is no compensation for the redundant troops because it is not part of policy, this is probably not carlosses' fault but the fault of the conservative party policy in general. the government are laying off troops that have fought and bled for the crown because there is no need for them in peacetime Britannica, it is good that there is no bloodloss in these times but there should be provisions of work and money for these heroes. it is the least we owe them for providing us with freedom. the third question about no troops at home is due to a fault in the defence strategy. maybe the government think that the people will defend the streets against the invader though, due to the serious faults in social provision i doubt this very much. we need a liberal government to provide the people with a sense of national pride. they are training troops in Parika whilst laying them off, i would imagine, to cut the expense of having to pay experienced veterans so they can pay raw recruits less though with the cost of lives. that seems an acceptable price to the conservative government. i hope i have answered your questions well, i ask for all other shadow ministers of war to answer the questions from your viewpoint. the more opinions we have the more effective a defence policy we can have for Britannica. thank you.

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.